<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panic! Firefox 3 is beyond reach</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.doeswhat.com/2008/06/17/panic-firefox-3-is-beyond-reach/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.doeswhat.com/2008/06/17/panic-firefox-3-is-beyond-reach/</link>
	<description>New Technology Explained</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DoesWhat</title>
		<link>http://www.doeswhat.com/2008/06/17/panic-firefox-3-is-beyond-reach/comment-page-1/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>DoesWhat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 08:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doeswhat.com/?p=64#comment-156</guid>
		<description>If by the last sentence you believe that IE8 is better than Firefox 3 then I have to disagree with you somewhat. IE8 is still very unstable as it is in beta. Firefox 3 is currently far superior to IE8.

In response to point 1, in our experience, we have had no problem with this.
Point 2, we don't actually use any Live services.
Point 3, really depends on the person, we love it. (Apart from its name, "Awesome bar")
Point 4, we were led to believe that actually they have worked hard on improving memory usage, although we haven't really looked in detail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If by the last sentence you believe that IE8 is better than Firefox 3 then I have to disagree with you somewhat. IE8 is still very unstable as it is in beta. Firefox 3 is currently far superior to IE8.</p>
<p>In response to point 1, in our experience, we have had no problem with this.<br />
Point 2, we don&#8217;t actually use any Live services.<br />
Point 3, really depends on the person, we love it. (Apart from its name, &#8220;Awesome bar&#8221;)<br />
Point 4, we were led to believe that actually they have worked hard on improving memory usage, although we haven&#8217;t really looked in detail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajay</title>
		<link>http://www.doeswhat.com/2008/06/17/panic-firefox-3-is-beyond-reach/comment-page-1/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>ajay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 06:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doeswhat.com/?p=64#comment-154</guid>
		<description>Firefox 3 is not good as compare to Firefox2
(1) Firefox 3 is always hangs up when i open up any PDF Files
(2) My Windows Live Service Won't work
(3) address bar is really bad. i don't need so much of information.
(4)Firefox3  also ask for a lot of memort and cpu.

As comapre to Firefox3 IE8 is some what betther.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox 3 is not good as compare to Firefox2<br />
(1) Firefox 3 is always hangs up when i open up any PDF Files<br />
(2) My Windows Live Service Won&#8217;t work<br />
(3) address bar is really bad. i don&#8217;t need so much of information.<br />
(4)Firefox3  also ask for a lot of memort and cpu.</p>
<p>As comapre to Firefox3 IE8 is some what betther.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
